Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  43 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 43 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

DESCRIPTION OF THE MAIN

BUSINESS RISKS

On an annual basis, the Board of Directors and

Management conduct a risk assessment to gain insight

into the main business risks, which assessment is subse-

quently analyzed and approved by the Board of Directors.

As in previous years, in 2014 this again occurred on the

basis of a written survey of the participants to gain both

quantitative and qualitative results, enabling risks to be

assessed in order of scale. Although this way of working

enables Kinepolis to distinguish important risks from less

important risks in a well-founded way, it remains an

estimation that, inherent to the definition of risk, provides

no guarantee whatsoever of the actual occurrence of

risk events. The following list (in random order) therefore

contains only some of the risks to which Kinepolis

is exposed.

Availability and quality of supplied material

Bearing in mind that Kinepolis Group NV does not produce

any material itself (such as films), it is dependent on the

availability, diversity and quality of films as well as the

possibility of being able to rent this material from distribu-

tors. Kinepolis Group NV endeavors to protect itself

wherever possible by maintaining good long-term

relations with the major distributors or producers, by

pursuing a content diversification policy and by playing a

role as distributor in Belgium. The investments in Tax

Shelter projects should also be viewed in this light.

Seasonal effects

The operating revenue of Kinepolis Group can vary from

period to period, because the producers and distributors

decide when their films are released completely

independently of the cinema operators and because

certain periods, such as holidays, can traditionally have

an impact on visitor numbers. The weather can also play

an important role in the frequency of cinema visits.

Kinepolis largely accepts this risk, considering that the

costs of a financial hedging policy would exceed the

revenue from it, but endeavors to mitigate the conse-

quences among other things by variabilizing its cost

structure to a maximum degree.

Competition

Kinepolis Group’s position as a cinema operator is subject

to competition just like every other product or service for

which substitution exists. Kinepolis Group’s position is

impacted by increasing competition from other leisure

activities, such as concerts and sporting events, which

can influence the behaviour of Kinepolis customers.

This competition also comes from the cinemas of other

operators – both existing and prospective – in the

markets where the Group is active and from the increas-

ing distribution and availability of films through non-cin-

ema channels, such as video-on-demand, pay-per-view

and internet. This development can also be influenced by

the shortening of the period ordinarily observed by the

distributors, between the first screening of a film in the

cinema and its availability through other channels, as

well as the constant technical improvement in the quality

of these alternative ways of watching films. Besides

these legal alternatives, the cinema industry also has to

deal with illegal downloads. Kinepolis is working actively

with distributors to agree measures to counter any

increasing illegal sharing of material online.

41

KINEPOLIS GROUP

ANNUAL REPORT 2014

03 / MANAGEMENT REPORT