Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  52 128 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 52 128 Next Page
Page Background

Employee risks

As a service company, Kinepolis Group largely depends on

its employees to provide high-quality service. Hiring and

retaining the right managers and employees with the

requisite knowledge and experience in all parts of the

Company is therefore a constant challenge. Kinepolis accepts

this challenge by offering attractive terms of employment,

good knowledge management and a pleasant working

atmosphere. Kinepolis measures employee satisfaction on

the basis of employee surveys and where necessary

improves its policies.

Risks arising from exceptional events

Events of an exceptional nature, including but not limited

to extreme weather, political unrest and terrorist attacks,

in a country where Kinepolis Group is active and that result

in material damage to one of the multiplexes, a fall in the

number of customers or disruption in the delivery of

products can have a negative impact on activities. Kinepolis

strives to minimize the potential impact of such risks

through a combination of preventive (such as construction

decisions, evacuation planning) and detection measures

(such as fire detection systems) and by taking out proper

insurance.

Environmental liability and property risks

The property that Kinepolis Group owns and leases is subject

to regulations with regard to environmental liability and

potential property risks. In addition to the above mentioned

measures to control political and regulatory risks, Kinepolis

will take appropriate measures to prevent environmental

damage and limit property risks.

Other risks

After the acquisition by KP Immo Brussel NV (a subsidiary of

Kinepolis Group NV) of the premises in Galerie Toison d’Or

(Guldenvlieslaan/Avenue de la Toison d’Or 8) in Brussels

(Belgium), which are leased to the cinema operator UGC

Belgium, Kinepolis Group NV and its subsidiary were served

with a summons by the aforementioned tenant before the

Commercial Court in Brussels to declare the aforementioned

transaction null and void due to alleged breaches of the

Economic Law Book and one of the conditions imposed on

Kinepolis Group by the Belgian Competition Authority in 1997.

UGC Belgium also filed a complaint with this Competition

Authority at year-end 2014. The Commercial Court ruled in

favor of Kinepolis at the end of 2016, with UCG Belgium then

lodging an appeal at the Court of Appeal in Brussels.

The other risks stated in 2015 (the Luxembourg competition

case and the lack of an operating license for an acquired

cinema) were also resolved successfully in 2016.

Lastly, it can be reported that Kinepolis is currently involved

in proceedings relating to a tax ruling applied to it in 2012.

On 11 January 2016 the European Commission published its

decision that the Belgian tax rulings with regard to excess

profit are considered to be unlawful state aid. The decision of

the European Commission obliges the Belgian government to

make an additional claim for tax that would have been owed

if such tax rulings had not been applied. As a consequence of

the decision of the European Commission, in accordance with

IAS 12 Kinepolis has set up a provision of € 9.4 million for a

Kinepolis Enschede (NL)

03 / MANAGEMENT REPORT

52

KINEPOLIS GROUP

ANNUAL REPORT 2016